Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Young, J. R. Articles by Probert, I. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A review of selected aspects of coccolithophore biology with implications for paleobiodiversity estimation

¹ Palaeontology Department, The Natural History Museum London
² Alfred Wegener Inst. f. Polar and Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany
³ Algobank-Caen, Universite de Caen Basse Normandie, Caen, France, email: j.young{at}nhm.ac.uk

To help understand potential biases in coccolithophore paleo-biodiversity estimates various aspects of their biology are reviewed based on the recent monographic guide to extant coccolithophore taxonomy and research developed within the CODENET project. The evidence for life-cycles in coccolithophores involving two biomineralized phases is reviewed in detail, and it is shown that these are likely to have been pervasive through the fossil record of coccolithophores. The extent of polymorphism in extant coccolithophores is reviewed and a surprisingly strong correlation with phylogeny is documented, in particular it is shown that there is a very strong correlation between polymorphism in heterococcolith and holococcolith-bearing phases. Recent documentation of (pseudo)cryptic speciation in coccolithophores is discussed and it is argued that this provides considerable support for the rather fine morphological taxonomy adopted by nannofossil paleontologists, but also means that accurate recognition of species in the fossil record is an almost impossible goal. Finally the diversity of extant coccolithophores is compared with that recorded in Holocene sediments and it is shown that the majority of extant diversity is represented by small rare species with very low preservation potential. It is argued that this is the most serious potential biasing mechanism for study of paleobiodiversity changes since estimates of diversity at any time will be strongly influenced by the availability of well-preserved shelf sediments and of the intensity of their study by electron microscopy. Moreover, secular changes in coccolith size in relation to environmental change could significantly affect the preserved diversity of coccolithophores.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P.R. Bown, T. D. Jones, J.A. Lees, R.D. Randell, J.A. Mizzi, P.N. Pearson, H.K. Coxall, J.R. Young, C.J. Nicholas, A. Karega, et al. A Paleogene calcareous microfossil Konservat-Lagerstatte from the Kilwa Group of coastal Tanzania Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 120(1-2): 3 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-P. Aubry A major Pliocene coccolithophore turnover: Change in morphological strategy in the photic zone Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 424(0): 25 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-P. Aubry and A. Kahn New coccolithophores from the deep photic zone: Implications for evolutionary morphological convergence in the calcareous nannoplankton Micropaleontology, December 1, 2006; 52(5): 411 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]