Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Micropaleontology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Micropaleontology; January 2001; v. 47; no. 1; p. 73-86; DOI: 10.2113/47.1.73
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbieri, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Taphonomic implications of foraminiferal composition and abundance in intertidal mud flats, Colorado River delta (Mexico)

Roberto Barbieri

University of Bologna, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e Geologico-Ambientali, Bologna, Italy

The tidal mud flats of the Colorado River delta are located at the head of the Gulf of California. This region is characterized by exceptionally high nutrient concentrations which are able to sustain a high primary productivity. This study documents the taxonomic composition of foraminiferal assemblages of this area and their preservation potential from the intertidal zone of the southwesternmost part of the delta plain, in surface and subsurface (down to 20 cm deep) sediments sampled north of San Felipe. Thirty-three species belonging to seventeen genera have been recognized: calcareous perforate taxa make up most of the assemblage, whereas imperforate taxa (Miliolina) are less frequent and agglutinated taxa are virtually absent. Only a small number of specimens, belonging to offshore species, were likely conveyed to the delta during storms. In general, the foraminiferal surface density seems largely controlled by burrowers and deposit feeder activity, alkalinity, degree of dissolution, and the type of sediment. Counts of total foraminifera show that subsurface samples have higher densities-by one order of magnitude-than those registered in surface samples. In the study area, which is characterized by low to absent sedimentation, rapid sediment reworking may alter surface/subsurface faunal ratios and buried specimens may repeatedly be reworked to the surface in the taphonomically active zone. This is a possible explanation for the distribution of dissolution, which is higher in subsurface than surface assemblages and which exhibits no relationship to the age of specimens.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Foraminiferal ResearchHome page
P. Diz and G. Frances
POSTMORTEM PROCESSES AFFECTING BENTHIC FORAMINIFERAL ASSEMBLAGES IN THE RIA DE VIGO, SPAIN: IMPLICATIONS FOR PALEOENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Journal of Foraminiferal Research, July 1, 2009; 39(3): 166 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
Sieves and Fossils: Effects of Mesh Size on Paleontological Patterns
Palaios, October 1, 2003; 18(4-5): 460 - 469.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Micropaleontology Project